Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 07:32

Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Why do people reject the usage of the Cursor IDE?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Exactly When Apple Will Launch iPhone 17 And iPhone 17 Pro - Forbes
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
How does growing up in chaos affect a child as they become an adult?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Young & Restless Preview: Cane’s Agenda Revealed — ‘No More Secrets and No More Games’ - Soaps.com
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Why Cutting Carbs Usually Backfires—and What to Do Instead - EatingWell
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Billionaire YouTuber MrBeast ‘borrowing’ money from mom for his wedding - New York Post
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Android 16 bug is turning Pixel navigation into a nightmare - Android Central